9 4 Comparing Traditional & Activity-based Costing Financial and Managerial Accounting


Natalie Tan

Natalie Tan

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet consectetur adipiscing elit dolor

Traditional Costing Vs Abc

However, what some organisations have found is that even though there are theoretical benefits, it’s a complex process, and ABC brings with it some problems. “Over the past 15 years, ABC has enabled managers to see that not all revenue is good and not all customers are profitable customers.” The common ‘top-down’ management style and organisational culture among SOEs worked well when instigating innovative ideas and inducing corporate-wide learning.

Traditional Costing Vs Abc

Ask Any Difference is a website that is owned and operated by Indragni Solutions. A few years ago we as a company were searching for various terms and wanted to know the differences between them. Ever since then, we’ve been tearing up the trails and immersing ourselves in this wonderful hobby of writing about the differences and comparisons. We’ve learned from on-the-ground experience about these terms specially the product comparisons. Our systems have detected unusual traffic activity from your network. Please complete this reCAPTCHA to demonstrate that it’s you making the requests and not a robot.

Step 3. Find Each Product’s Total Direct Costs Per Unit

The direct costing system as suggested by its name, only allocates direct costs to the products or services; it does not attempt to allocate indirect costs. Therefore, it reports only the contribution attributable from the product or service towards indirect costs incurred by the business. The direct costing method is only pertinent for decision making process where the indirect costs are small part of the overall organisational costs or does not fluctuate greatly to changes in demand. ABC provides a way to allocate costs more accurately when overhead costs are not incurred at the same rate as direct labor dollars. The more activities identified, the more complex the costing system becomes.

What is meant by Kaizen costing?

Kaizen costing is a cost reduction system used after a product's design has been completed and it is in production. Business professor Yasuhiro Monden defines kaizen costing as. The maintenance of present cost levels for products currently being manufactured via systematic efforts to achieve the desired cost level.

The state of the art approach with authentication and authorization in IETF standard RADIUS gives an easy solution for accounting all workposition based activities. That simply defines the extension of the Authentication and Authorization concept to a more advanced AA and Accounting concept. Respective approaches for AAA get defined and staffed in the context of mobile services, when using smart phones as e.a. Intelligent agents or smart agents for automated capture of accounting data . Traditionally, cost accountants had arbitrarily added a broad percentage of analysis into the indirect cost.

Traditional Costing Systems

In defining ABC, first of all, what we would say is it is a more complex system of cost accounting than absorption costing. ABC gives us a much more detailed look at the manufacturing part of a business if we’re talking about a manufacturing organisation. Although some may argue that costs untraceable to activities should be “arbitrarily allocated” to products, it is important to realize that the only purpose of ABC is to provide information to management. Therefore, there is no reason to assign any cost in an arbitrary manner.

  • Activity-based costing benefits the costing process by expanding the number of cost pools that can be used to analyze overhead costs and by making indirect costs traceable to certain activities.
  • However, in conventional costing the distribution of that total to individual products is based on an indirect measure of that cost.
  • The aim, in other words, is to find the true gross profit margins for individual products.
  • Once costs of the activities have been identified, the cost of each activity is attributed to each product to the extent that the product uses the activity.
  • Enables accurate costing of all activities to be obtained throughout an organisation.
  • It also helps in evaluating performances and sets standards which can help the manager to use this information for comparison purposes.

The allocation of indirect costs is at least somewhat arbitrary, even using sophisticated accounting methods. Traditional costing systemsare simpler and easier to implement than ABC systems. However, traditional costing systems are not as accurateas ABC systems. Traditional costingsystems can also Traditional Costing Vs Abc result in significant under-costing and over-costing. Overheads, while they still existed, were a relatively small proportion of what Ford’s production costs were. As a result, the need to employ an approach such as ABC, which offers a really deep dive on the overheads, just wasn’t required.


Some activity-based costing calculations may become so complex that they require you to use special software, which could be expensive. The simpler nature of traditional costing means it requires less input and less work, making it less expensive. Activity-Based Costing is an Information System developed in the 1980s to overcome some of the limitations of traditional cost accounting and to enhance its usefulness to strategic decision-making. The overhead costs assigned to each activity comprise an activity cost pool. Assigning the cost of each activity to products and services. This can be done by estimating the amount of resources used by each product or service, or by using actual data from past projects. One of the benefits of ABC is that it can help identify and eliminate activities that are not adding value to products and services.

Traditional Costing Vs Abc

Managers can evaluate the performance of individuals, groups, projects, initiatives, and programs, with more certainty and accuracy when they know their true costs through https://quickbooks-payroll.org/ ABC. Identifying truly profitable and truly unprofitable products. Able 8 below shows the per-unit profitability estimates for each product from the examples above.

Step 1. Find Total Direct Costs

First, it expands the number of cost pools that can be used to assemble overhead costs. Instead of accumulating all costs in one company-wide pool, it pools costs by activity. Activities consume overhead resources and are considered cost objects.

Traditional Costing Vs Abc

Such resistance is natural as the most common objective is to give a reduction in overhead costs, and in almost all circumstances this could result in a reduction in personnel. Review the terminology section below before you read this short comparison of the two costing methods to determine which method is best suited to your business. Activity-based costing uses only two activities, but traditional costing uses four activities.

Traditional Costing vs. ABC

Let’s say a company manufactures 10,000 units of a particular product with a cost per unit of $10 in direct materials, $8 in direct labor, and $2 in variable manufacturing costs. Let’s say the company also has fixed manufacturing overhead costs totaling $40,000 per year.

ABC is used to get a better grasp on costs, allowing companies to form a more appropriate pricing strategy. An activity is a cost driver, such as purchase orders or machine setups. Any information contained within this essay is intended for educational purposes only. It should not be treated as authoritative or accurate when considering investments or other financial products. Finally, the examples show that ABC requires more data and a more detailed analysis than the traditional PVB allocation approach. Manufacturing firms do not set up production machines for each product unit.

How Activity-Based Costing (ABC) Works

Traditional and activity-based costing methods have similarities and differences based on the production methods of a company. Learn about the costs in production and see the comparisons between traditional and activity-based costing systems.

  • ABC is generally used as a tool for understanding product and customer cost and profitability based on the production or performing processes.
  • One of the biggest advantages of ABC is to provide more and accurate information in stages.
  • The ABC system of cost accounting is based on activities, which are considered any event, unit of work, or task with a specific goal.
  • Outside sources may not need such an accurate representation of costs, and estimates might be all you need to get the point across.
  • We’re also told that we have to pay supplier orders every time we make a batch, and that makes sense, because if we’re going to make a batch of products, we’d have to order materials.

Traditional costing is easy to implement and is the most common costing method used. Accountants created the ABC method to solve the problems of inaccuracy that result from the traditional costing approach. Managers needed more accurate costing methods to determine which profits were actually profitable and which were not. Traditional costing adds an average overhead rate to the direct costs of manufacturing products.

Companies with a hard deadline for reporting may choose traditional costing to save preparation time. Another scenario would be a company that only produces one product, such as a custom hat business that offers hand-made hats rather than an assembly-line product.

  • ABC contrasts with traditional costing , which sometimes assigns costs using somewhat arbitrary allocation percentages for overhead or the so-called indirect costs.
  • In the field of accounting, activity-based costing and traditional costingare two different methods for allocating indirect costs to products.
  • The cost driver rate is used in activity-based costing to calculate the amount of overhead and indirect costs related to a particular activity.
  • Many companies rely on traditional costing when it pertains to external reporting.

So, at two orders per batch, that would be 160 supplier orders. So, if we’re going to make 80,000 units in the period, with 1,000 units in each batch, it’s nice and simple. What we’re asked to work out is the supplier ordering cost per unit of Product B, and we’ve got a range of different options, A through to D.

This highlights the reasons for certain costs being incurred, which can ultimately help control and manage these costs. Traditional costing does not compel management to look for different cost centers and so it becomes difficult for management to gather incremental data about production activities.

What is traditional costing?

Traditional costing is the allocation of factory overhead to products based on the volume of production resources consumed. Under this method, overhead is usually applied based on either the amount of direct labor hours consumed or machine hours used.

Latest Article


Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

A creative digital agency which focuses on design, development, and digital marketing, thus helping our clients to improve their business.